

A practical, founder-friendly checklist to improve your odds of a CoinGecko listing for your Solana token—without wasting weeks on avoidable mistakes.

You launch a token.
The chart looks alive, people are chatting, and your first holders are posting memes like it’s a full-time job.
Then someone asks the question that changes your whole week:
“Wen CoinGecko?”
If you’ve never gone through a listing process before, it’s easy to assume CoinGecko is just a form you submit and (boom) you’re in. In reality, listings are closer to a trust check: does this token look real, trackable, and consistently traded—without looking like a haunted house with the lights flickering on and off?
This guide walks you through a practical, founder-friendly plan to improve your odds of getting listed—especially as a Solana token.
TL;DR (save this):
- Your “listing readiness” is mostly about clean metadata + verifiable links + consistent market activity.
- Aim for steady liquidity (often $10k–$50k+), non-spiky volume, and real holder growth in the first 7–14 days.
- Make it easy to verify everything: website, socials, contract, DEX pair, and analytics pages.
- Use tools to build consistency (not chaos). Start with the core stack: /features, /dashboard, and the /calculator.
What CoinGecko actually checks (and what it doesn’t)
CoinGecko isn’t “rating” your token’s memes.
They’re trying to answer simpler questions:
- Can we track it reliably? (contract, chain, pair, price feed)
- Is there real market activity? (trades, liquidity, market depth)
- Is the project verifiable? (website, socials, team/project signals)
- Is the data clean? (no broken links, wrong tickers, confusing branding)
And here’s what surprises most first-time founders:
It’s not just about volume
Yes, volume matters. But quality of volume matters more than a single big day.
A token that does $300k in volume once and then flatlines looks less credible than one that prints $20k–$60k/day consistently for a week.
CoinGecko wants clarity, not mystery
If your website doesn’t match your token name, or your X handle is different from your brand, you’re creating friction.
Friction slows reviews.
It’s not “pay-to-win,” but it is “proof-to-win”
If you can’t prove:
- which contract is yours,
- which DEX pool is “official,”
- and where people should track it,
…you’re asking the reviewer to do extra detective work. That’s rarely a good strategy.
For their own listing page and policies, see CoinGecko directly: https://www.coingecko.com/
CoinGecko vs CoinMarketCap: what’s different? (Quick comparison)

Most teams apply to both eventually.
Here’s the simplest way to think about it: CoinGecko rewards clean data + trackable markets; CoinMarketCap often emphasizes similar criteria but can feel stricter on verification/consistency for newer tokens.
| Factor | CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap | |---|---|---| | Primary focus | Trackable markets + clean metadata | Trackable markets + verification consistency | | What helps most | Stable liquidity + consistent trading + clear links | Strong identity + consistent trading + clean supply details | | Biggest mistake | Missing/incorrect pair + messy branding | Mismatched supply, tickers, and broken links |
CoinMarketCap (for reference): https://coinmarketcap.com/
The 7-step listing readiness plan (built for Solana tokens)
Think of this like getting approved for a rental apartment.
You can be a great tenant (good token), but if your paperwork is messy (bad metadata), you’re not getting the keys.
Step 1: Lock down your “official identity” (name, ticker, links)
Before you push volume, before you chase trending—make your identity unambiguous.
Checklist:
- Exact token name + ticker used everywhere
- Website with:
- contract address
- how to buy (simple steps)
- risk disclaimer
- One “primary” social hub (X or Telegram), and it should match the brand
If your token is “FROG,” don’t make the website “frogcoinxyz” while your X is “FrogOnSol” and your Telegram is “FROGportal2.”
That’s how reviewers (and users) get spooked.
Step 2: Make your on-chain basics easy to verify
CoinGecko listings live and die on traceability.
On Solana, that means:
- correct mint address
- correct DEX pool / pair
- correct decimals and token metadata
If you’re building anything custom, use Solana’s official docs as your source of truth: https://solana.com/docs
Practical tip: put the mint address in 3 places:
- website footer
- pinned Telegram message
- pinned X post
You’re reducing “is this the real one?” confusion.
Step 3: Build liquidity that doesn’t evaporate
Liquidity is your token’s “trust floor.”
It’s also the difference between:
- a chart that buyers can actually enter/exit
- and a chart that looks like a trap
For newer Solana tokens, teams often target ranges like:
- $10,000–$25,000 minimum to feel tradeable
- $25,000–$100,000+ if you’re trying to look “serious” fast
This isn’t an official requirement.
It’s just the reality of how market participants (and analytics pages) perceive you.
If you need help planning targets, use the /calculator to map out the volume/liquidity you’re aiming for and what it might cost in fees.
Step 4: Create consistent volume (not one giant spike)
Here’s the mistake I see constantly:
A team does a single “volume push,” prints a huge green candle, hits a trending page for 30 minutes… and then volume collapses by 80–95% the next day.
That pattern screams “campaign,” not “market.”
If your goal is a listing, you want the opposite:
- steady transactions throughout the day
- healthy buy/sell mix
- repeated participation (not just one wallet doing everything)
This is where automation helps—when it’s used to create consistency, not chaos.
If you’re new to the concept, read: Solana Volume Bots 2025 Guide
Step 5: Grow holders like a real product, not a lottery ticket
CoinGecko doesn’t publish a “you need X holders” rule.
But in practice, holder distribution affects perception.
A token with:
- 300–1,000 holders
- and steady adds each day
…looks very different from a token with:
- 70 holders
- 3 wallets holding 90%
If your holder count is stuck, don’t just yell “buy” louder.
Give people a reason to stick around:
- a simple roadmap
- weekly updates
- community roles
- clear “what happens next?” milestones
And if you’re specifically trying to improve holder distribution, check out /features/holder-booster.
Step 6: Make your chart pages “reviewer-friendly”
When someone reviews your listing request, they’ll click out.
They’ll check whether:
- price is visible
- the pair is correct
- the project links are consistent
- trading activity looks natural
You don’t control everything, but you can control how clean your ecosystem looks.
A helpful stack for that:
- /dashboard to monitor volume patterns and execution
- /features/dexscreener-trending-bot if your plan includes trending visibility
- /features/dexscreener-reactions to add social proof on the page where traders already are
If you want the broader toolkit overview, start here: /features.
Step 7: Submit the listing when your data is strongest (timing matters)
Submitting too early is like applying for a job with half a resume.
A practical timing window many teams use:
- Day 7–14 after launch
- once liquidity is stable
- once volume is consistent
- once links and branding are clean
If you submit on Day 1, you’re usually submitting:
- thin liquidity
- chaotic chart
- unfinished website
…and you’re hoping for a miracle.
Instead, treat the first 2 weeks as “build proof.”
Volume, liquidity, and “looking real” without chaos

Let’s talk about what you actually do day-to-day.
Because the difference between a token that gets traction and a token that gets ignored is often just: consistency.
The “healthy market” pattern to aim for
A simple pattern that tends to look credible:
- Volume spread across 12–18 hours/day, not 30 minutes
- Transactions occurring every 30–180 seconds during active windows
- No single wallet dominating all trades
- Liquidity not swinging wildly every few hours
This is why manual trading often fails at “appearance.”
Humans get tired. Bots don’t.
If you’re deciding between manual and automated execution, this breakdown helps: Volume Bot vs Manual Trading
A realistic 14-day traction plan (with numbers)
Here’s a practical target schedule for many small-to-mid launches. Adjust to your budget and category.
Days 1–3: Prove the market exists
Focus: survival and clarity.
Targets you can aim for:
- Liquidity: $10k–$25k
- Volume: $15k–$50k/day
- Holders: 100–300
Tactics:
- keep spreads reasonable
- avoid massive one-off candles
- build a consistent baseline
Days 4–7: Make activity predictable
Focus: consistency beats intensity.
Targets you can aim for:
- Liquidity: $25k–$60k
- Volume: $30k–$120k/day
- Holders: 300–700
Tactics:
- introduce scheduled “activity windows” (morning + evening)
- add DexScreener social proof if it fits your brand
- tighten branding and links everywhere
Days 8–14: Prepare to submit
Focus: proof package.
Targets you can aim for:
- Liquidity: $50k–$150k (if the budget supports it)
- Volume: $50k–$250k/day steady
- Holders: 700–2,000
Tactics:
- smooth volume (no 10x spikes)
- reduce single-wallet concentration
- keep community growth stable
If you’re wondering how teams budget this, the /calculator is the fastest way to estimate costs before you commit.
The #1 mistake: chasing trending before you’re ready
Trending is a spotlight.
If your storefront looks messy, a spotlight doesn’t help—you just attract more people to a bad first impression.
Before you push for trending:
- fix your website copy
- ensure contract/pair links are correct
- ensure liquidity can handle new buyers
If trending is part of your plan, keep it structured and controlled. This is where a dedicated tool (like /features/dexscreener-trending-bot) can help you maintain consistency.
“Is this wash trading?” Let’s be real about risk
You should assume:
- exchanges, aggregators, and users are watching patterns
- obvious self-trading loops are a credibility killer
Your safest long-term approach is to use automation to:
- spread activity across time
- avoid unnatural spikes
- avoid single-wallet dominance
- keep behavior market-like
Also, protect your team.
If you haven’t read it yet, this security checklist is worth 10 minutes: Volume Bot Tips & Best Practices
The “Listing Proof Pack”: what to prepare before you apply
When you submit, you want your answers to be boring—in a good way.
Here’s what you should have ready in one doc (Google Doc is fine):
- Token name + ticker
- Chain: Solana
- Mint address
- Official website
- Official X + Telegram/Discord
- DEX pool link(s)
- Brief project description (2–3 sentences)
- Circulating supply / total supply explanation (simple and consistent)
Then double-check:
- Do all links work?
- Does the website clearly show the contract?
- Is branding identical across platforms?
This “proof pack” also helps if you apply to CoinMarketCap later.
Using SolanaVolumeBot.com tools to stay consistent (without guessing)
If your goal is “look legit for 14 days straight,” you want tooling that supports consistency.
Here’s a simple way to think about the site sections:
- Core overview: Start at / to understand what the Solana volume bot is designed to do.
- Feature toolkit: Browse /features to match tools to your goal (volume, holders, chart visibility).
- Plan your budget: Use /calculator before you spend a dollar.
- Run + monitor: Use /dashboard to track what’s happening without living in 10 different tabs.
- Pricing clarity: Check /pricing when you’re ready to pick a plan.
- Step-by-step usage: If you want the setup flow, go to /how-to-use.
And if you’re building with partners or callers, /referrals can help you align incentives.
Frequently asked questions (quick hits)
How long does a CoinGecko listing take?
It varies. The fastest outcomes usually happen when your submission is clean, verifiable, and your markets are stable. Messy submissions often get delayed or require rework.
Do I need to be on a specific Solana DEX?
CoinGecko mainly needs a trackable market and clear “official” pair. What matters most is that the pool is real, liquid enough, and consistently traded.
What if my token is brand new?
That’s fine—just don’t rush the submission. Build 7–14 days of evidence: stable liquidity, consistent volume, and clean project identity.
Should I apply to CoinMarketCap too?
Yes, but treat CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap as separate review processes. Your “proof pack” should work for both.
Related Reading (recommended next)
If you want to go deeper on the mechanics behind volume, visibility, and execution, these are the best next reads:
Your next move (simple CTA)
If you’re serious about getting your Solana token listed, your job is to make your project easy to verify and hard to ignore.
Start by planning your targets in /calculator, then map the tools you need in /features.
When you’re ready to run a consistent visibility push, check /pricing and spin everything up from /dashboard.
If you want help picking the right setup for your token and budget, reach out here: /contact.
Written by
Ready to Boost Your Token?
Join thousands of successful projects using our advanced Solana Volume Bot platform. Increase your token's visibility, attract investors, and dominate the trending charts.
